A CRACKDOWN is under way on property agents who lodge misleading advertisements for industrial sites.
More than 20 warning letters have been issued to agents this year and some unauthorised uses are being investigated.
The move - a joint effort between the Council for Estate Agencies (CEA) and the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) - is in line with the Government's push to weed out rogue tenants and landlords in industrial areas.
Businesses such as shops and tuition centres have been using industrial sites, which have lower rents than commercial premises, but they have been accused of pushing up costs as they compete for space with genuine industrialists.
The CEA has investigated 32 property agents this year who allegedly marketed industrial units wrongfully.
Some cases are pending, but letters of advice have been handed to 23 agents who 'did not check the classification of the premise use and wrongly advertised industrial units at various developments such as Oxley Bizhub, One Commonwealth and One Pemimpin', CEA's deputy director for licensing Yeap Soon Teck told The Straits Times.
Similarly, the URA said it has investigated some users at places like The Alexcier in Alexandra Road, First Centre in Serangoon North and Midview City in Sin Ming Lane and given them time to stop the unauthorised use.
The sites were used for commercial purposes such as business consultancies, accountancy and book-keeping services and schools.
On Wednesday, the agencies issued a joint circular to remind agents and landlords that it is their responsibility to give accurate information to potential buyers. It stated that properties slated for industrial use should not be marketed for 'business' - which can be misinterpreted as offices - or 'offices', which are not allowed in such buildings.
The onus is also on developers to ensure accurate information on marketing materials and that appointed agents do not mislead buyers.
Misleading marketing of units will breach the CEA's Code of Ethics and Professional Client Care, which can lead to fines of up to $75,000 and/or suspension or licence revocation.
The URA said that if the unauthorised use does not cease within a stipulated timeframe, the penalty for these users could be a fine of up to $200,000 or a one-year jail term or both.
URA rules stipulate that at least 60 per cent of the total floor area of an industrial site has to be used for core industrial activities like warehousing and production. The remaining space can be taken up by some non-industrial uses like ancillary offices and staff canteens.
Shops and offices should be located in commercial sites, such as shopping malls.
A three-year reprieve was recently granted for religious groups using such spaces.
Property agents said it is standard practice to make the approved use of the place clear to the potential buyer. They add that some tenants could have been misled by agents out to make a quick buck.
An agent from Vestor Realty said the buyers should always check with URA to be sure.
Ms Chia Siew Chuin, director of research and advisory at Colliers International, said that the definition of allowable uses should be reviewed to make it more relevant to today's business models.
'The guidelines could have been set some time back, and business models have evolved since then,' she said.
'For instance, some segments of the business might appear to be office-like and lighter in nature with advanced technologies... but they are still part of the manufacturing process... these are not clear-cut cases.'
Ms Chia noted that the circular is a sign that the Government is keeping an eye on the industrial sector.
It is also a move to protect layman buyers, who might find that the workings of the industrial market are not as straightforward as residential's.
The Straits Times noted several accountancy firms at Midview City in Sin Ming Lane. An accountant in his 20s, who gave his name only as Mr Chia, said he moved there as he thought it was a 'good deal', compared to prices in the Tanjong Pagar area. He paid about $600,000 for the 1,400 sq ft of space.
He said he liked the working environment. 'I checked the occupants before I decided to buy. If there was a large proportion of manufacturing or heavy industry to services, I wouldn't have come here.'